Which standard relates to a person's mental capacity in determining guilt?

The standard that relates to a person's mental capacity in determining guilt is centered on their ability to distinguish right from wrong. This concept is crucial in the legal system, particularly in assessing a defendant's mental state at the time of an offense. The ability to differentiate between acceptable and unacceptable behavior is a fundamental component of legal culpability.

In criminal law, if a defendant can demonstrate they were unable to understand the nature of their actions or differentiate between right and wrong due to mental incapacity, they may be deemed not responsible for their actions. This is often referred to as the insanity defense, where a person's cognitive abilities and understanding of morality play a pivotal role in establishing their guilt or innocence.

While economic status, previous criminal records, and age can impact various aspects of a legal case, they do not directly pertain to an individual's mental capacity in understanding the moral implications of their actions. Thus, the ability to distinguish right from wrong is the key factor in evaluating a person's mental capacity regarding guilt in criminal proceedings.