Under what condition can a person be found not guilty by reason of entrapment?

A person can be found not guilty by reason of entrapment when a government officer induces or persuades them to commit a crime that they would not have otherwise committed. This legal principle is in place to protect individuals from being manipulated or tricked by law enforcement into engaging in criminal activities. The essence of entrapment is that the government should not set up an environment where ordinary individuals are compelled to violate the law. Therefore, if it is shown that the idea for the crime originated with law enforcement and that the perpetrator was left with no apparent choice but to commit the crime, this can warrant a not guilty verdict based on entrapment.

The other choices do not accurately capture the essence of the entrapment defense as defined in criminal law. An "awesome attorney" does not relate to the legal standard of entrapment. Inducement by a non-governmental individual usually isn't grounds for an entrapment defense since it does not involve law enforcement tactics. Finally, merely confessing to a crime does not impact the possibility of an entrapment defense. The key issue revolves around the involvement of a government official in inducing the criminal action.