In which circumstance is impossibility not a defense to a charge of criminal attempt?

In the context of criminal law, specifically regarding attempts, the notion of impossibility refers to situations where an individual intends to commit a crime but is unable to do so for some reason. However, in many jurisdictions, including under Georgia law, if a person believes that the crime is possible to commit, it does not serve as a valid defense against charges of criminal attempt.

This principle is rooted in the rationale that the intent to commit a crime, coupled with the belief that the crime can be carried out, indicates a culpable mindset. The law seeks to punish individuals who harbor criminal intentions and take steps toward their commission, regardless of whether the intended crime could actually be realized. Therefore, even if an accused person mistakenly believes they can commit a crime, the legal system still holds them accountable for their attempt, as the focus is on their intent and actions rather than on the feasibility of the crime itself.

Consequently, when a person believes they can commit a crime, they affirm their culpability, and impossibility is not a viable defense in such cases.